About

About Me

Most people are trained to see the system or the people inside it. My work lives in the distance between the two.
I spent fifteen years as a lawyer. Most of that career was in Hollywood, where I worked for nearly a decade as an entertainment lawyer with credits across the James Bond franchise. Before that, I worked at the United Nations, in government, and in corporate practice.
My career put me inside more varied institutions than most people see in a lifetime. Private practice, public sector, international tribunals, government, the entertainment industry. Different rules, different power structures, different relationships to legitimacy. The same pattern showed up everywhere: a gap between what an institution promised the people inside it and what those people actually experienced. In some places, the gap was small enough to live with. In others, it had become structural, and the organization was paying for it whether or not it had named the cost.
I call this distance the Legitimacy Gap, and I think it’s the central problem facing organizations now. It quietly decides who stays, the capabilities of its leaders, and whether the next generation can become the people organizations need for stewardship of growth, succession, and knowledge transfer.
The work I do now sits at the intersection of the institutional and the personal. I advise organizations on leadership and capability development, with a particular focus on the conditions that form professionals at the start of their careers. I research and write about institutional trust, generational change, and what it takes to develop people in modern work conditions. And I speak regularly to leadership audiences in law, accounting, healthcare, technology, and education.
I’ve built a community of 65,000+ across social channels, where I test ideas in public and watch how they land. I run an ongoing research and video series, The Legitimacy Gap, where I interview early-career professionals, educators, and industry experts on how work and careers are changing and what modern work now requires. The interviews are primary source material for the writing, the speaking, and the program design.
I split my time between Melbourne and Los Angeles. The dual base reflects how I think about the work: built on Australian foundations, informed by a decade inside American institutions, oriented toward a body of research, writing, and ideas that travels across borders.
The structural gap I watched widen across fifteen years inside institutions isn’t a one-engagement fix. It’s a long arc, and it’s the one I’ve chosen. Everyone feels it, fewer can name it, and fewer still know how to fix it.

Read The Integration Problem

Download the free Starter Guide

Join the Room